After clicking through to Dobbs website his analytical style makes perfect sense. He is a son of two medical minds; the site tells us that he writes on the “genetics of temperament,” his writing is included in “science anthologies.”
So, how does an analytical writer write his mother’s love affair? He explains how he got started on the task, why it begged to be written. He carefully considers the implications on the lives of those his mother’s affair touched. The wronged wife. The abandoned children, now grown. He takes us from the present to the necessary moments of the past, skillfully drawing attitude speculations out of a progression of photo images, recording emotion in the words of the lover’s letters on his ill-fated night. And he considers the existential question, with Norman’s daughter, placing us with them on his southwestern patio; had the affair become a marriage he would never have existed. He is fair in his assessments of guilt and extenuating circumstances of war, cultural shift.
Dobbs writes of his mother as Norman's pin-up-girl, somewhat similar to the seductive look on this Rita Hayworth Movie poster, hard to believe now—but it was scandalously
revealing for the time. A difficulty that Dobbs has with his mother’s newly altered image from these revelations. And a telling look at the daring rebel she loved.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/food/assets_c/2011/06/A%20smoke%20in%20the%20PBY%20gun%20blister-thumb-600x624-53649.jpg
All things considered, I would dub his book narrative but not fully literary. But that’s just me.